The rightful conviction of Sophie Elliot’s killer – that full of himself Ranga, Clayton Weatherston, – for murder; has reminded the Saint just why he detests smart-arse, defence lawyers so much.
The Ginger tosser’s defence team – consisting of another ugly Ginga - Judith Abbott-Kerr - and the perennial defender of criminal scum - Greg King – and the methods they employed in trying to get Weatherston off have only gone to further decrease the already poor reputation of the law fraternity in the eyes of the general public.
What’s worse is you can bet that their well paid, amoral legal actions were funded by you and me – the long suffering taxpayer – as the self-proclaimed well hung, genius Dr Weatherston would not have had to shell out for this pair of sharks fees and their provocation defence tactics.
If anything good has come out of the gutless attack orchestrated on the character of the innocent Sophie Elliot – carried out by Weatherston, but aided and abetted by Abbot-Kerr and King’s tactics, is that Justice Minister Simon Power is moving fast to close the loop hole of provocation as a defence for murder.
Undoubtedly, the inevitable whines of “injustice” will emanated out the mouths of defence lawyers about this move from the likes of Abbot-Kerr, King - and their fellow bottom-feeding legal colleagues such as Chris Comesky, Peter Williams and Barry Hart. However, the general populous will applaud this decision – especially if it saves good and innocent families of victims – like Sophie Elliot’s parents – having to endure their child’s reputation being unfairly dragged through the mud in a desperate attempt to justify a murdering maggot’s actions.
The Saint understands that there is already a bounty out amongst the country’s incarcerated fraternity on Weatherston’s life. What do they say about honour among thieves? So it looks like Sophie Elliot will get some real justice after all – let’s just hope her blood and that of her murderer’s finally pricks the conscious of defence lawyers around the country that it is not ok to use any means necessary to get their clients’ off a rap.
However, it is doubtful that such smug and superior types as the Greg Kings and Judith Abbott-Kerrs of this world will pay any attention and only go on to prove this old adage:
What is the difference between a dog fish and a defence lawyer?
One is a scum-sucking, bottom feeder and the other is a form of marine life!
No comments:
Post a Comment